Issue 314

  • India’s Ministry of Electronics and IT extended the public consultation on the proposed amendments to IT Rules, including stricter labeling of AI content.
  • South Korea’s PIPC revised its guidelines for drafting personal information processing policy.
  • Malaysia’s PDP issued guidelines covering DPIA, data protection by design, automated decision-making and profiling.
  • The Australian Cyber Security Centre published guidance outlining cybersecurity risks and mitigation measures for agentic AI systems.
  • European Data Protection Board adopted guidelines on processing personal data for scientific research purposes and launched a public consultation.
  • The UK Secretary of State enacted Code of Practice on AI and automated decision-making regulations.
  • Italy’s Cybersecurity Agency issued guidance and procedures for classifying activities and services under NIS2 framework.
  • European Cybersecurity Agency released methodology for its technology and innovation radar, to assess emerging cybersecurity technologies and trends.
  • Germany’s Office of Information Security published the Criteria enabling Cloud Computing Autonomy (C3A) framework.
  • Ireland’s media regulator launched investigations into a technology company over manipulative interface designs on its social media platforms.
  • Belgian Data Protection Authority released updated guidelines on direct marketing under the GDPR.
  • Poland’s President signed Data Management Act implementing the EU Data Management Regulation.
  • The EU Commission preliminarily found a technology company in breach of the Digital Services Act by failing to prevent children from using social media platforms.
  • Estonia’s Supreme Court clarified conditions for use of IP address identification data in criminal investigations.
  • The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously approved the Guidelines for User Age-verification and Responsible Dialogue Act to protect children from AI chatbots.
  • Maryland’s Data Privacy Act, strengthening protections relating to personal data and immigration enforcement passed by both Chambers.
  • Canada’s Office of Privacy Commissioner released guidance on privacy-protective age assurance measures.
  • Connecticut Senate passed amendments to the Data Privacy Act regulating data brokers, facial recognition, geolocation data and genetic testing.
  • The U.S. Department of Justice intervened in a lawsuit challenging Colorado’s law on algorithmic discrimination.
  • Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner published guidance on sharing children’s personal information with Children’s Aid Societies.
  • A Michigan bill regulating companion chatbots and AI interactions involving minors referred to the review committee.
  • Iowa Senators requested information from AI companies on safeguards against Chinese espionage and insider threats.