Site icon Privacy Desk

Issue 92

Enforcement updates

Companies fined in US and UK for illegal calling

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), UK initiated its enforcement action against Parkin Beacher Ltd for making calls to pensioners regarding their pension plans and marketing private pension advisors without obtaining their informed consent. The ICO found the company in violation of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations for making 96,817 illegal calls and fined the company with GBP 50,000.
Similar action was undertaken by the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) against J.M. Burkman & Associates LLC and their representatives, for making illegal robocalls without prior express consent which was in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The LLC was fined with USD 5,134,500 which is highest ever for making robocalls.

Danish watchdog to inspect companies for data protection 

The Danish Data Protection Agency has launched inspection to assess and ensure that companies and municipalities in its jurisdiction remain compliant with the data protection. In this regard the agency has issued standardized questionnaire via an online tool which will form the basis for assessment of the level of data protection and privacy achieved by the companies. The Agency will also conduct a comparative evaluation across similar industries via the questionnaire tool.

Angry Birds makers sued for violating children’s privacy

The Attorney General of New Mexico, Hector Balderas filled a lawsuit against Rovio Entertainment, the developer of ‘Angry Birds’ game, for violating the provisions of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). The AG claimed that the makers of the game aggressively target children’s, and exfiltrate their personal data by using software embedded codes, and further sells it to a network of third-party marketing companies for commercial exploitation. The Lawsuit claims that such practice is done without full and complete disclosure of data collection, and without obtaining valid and verifiable consent from children’s parents. The lawsuit seeks damages from Rovio Entertainment and permanent injunction against the app.  

Clearview AI loses first round in Illinois privacy lawsuit

Clearview Al Inc. which is facing claims over unauthorized collection and use of the Illinois residents’ faceprints under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, lost its move to dismiss the lawsuit arguing lack of jurisdiction and merits. The Judge, however rejected the claims of Clearview AI and asserted that the court had jurisdiction to try the case and stated that the company’s face scanning practices are a matter of grave public privacy concern. The claim was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other advocacy rights groups. It is alleged that the companies had failed to acquire consumers’ consent before plucking their photographs off the internet, cataloguing their facial geometry, attaching a unique biometric identifier, and making the information available to public and private purchasers in an online database.

Guidance updates

GCC updates

China updates

EU updates

India updates

News around the globe

Read our digital newsletter here.


© 2019 Reina Consulting LLP – All rights reserved

Exit mobile version